It is not a logical question.
The painting is assembled and rearranged from pigment and wood pulp neither of which the artist created. The statue is revealed by uncovering it from it's surrounding stone by the artist who did not create the rock. The table is put together from carefully shaped pieces of wood. The carpenter did not create the tree. and so on...
In all cases the process of 'creating' actually means 'arranging' and is entirely predictable by science. "God created it" literally means it came into existence from nothing and is not related to the previous statements.
If they claimed that God bioengineered life on earth and geoengineered the solar system from existing materials the argument would hold however. But that would mean admitting that the solar system is older than both the Earth and Humanity and that just wouldn't do...
@James Prices answer. 'Creativity' isn't in the question or answer. It is purely about the speculation that if something exists it must have been made by someone/something. If a chair exists, somebody must have created it regardless of how creative or artistic the chair is. My point is that the definition of 'create' changes . For a chair and carpenter, 'create' means it was put together from existing materials. For the Earth and God, 'create' means magically popping out of thin air. A series of statements based on the first definition cannot conclude with a statement based on the second definition.
[edited to add the previous paragraph. We can't add comments until higher rep and I didn't want to pollute the answer list with a second post as this is a Q&A format, not a discussion thread]