***URGENT*** Skeptic Exchange will close down very soon unless you visit Area 51 and vote for it!
1

Taken from a comment on Think|Atheist:

Cholesterol drugs are among the worst, most lethal drugs of all, being pushed onto absolutely everyone. They've never even established the link between high cholesterol and heart attacks. Studies done by Big Pharma would lead you and your doctor to think so, though. It is difficult to find "independent" studies not funded by Big Pharma.

So, to break this down a little:

  • What is cholesterol?
  • What are the types of cholesterol medications?
  • Is there good research linking cholesterol levels to health problems?
  • Is there good research showing the efficacy of cholesterol medication in adjusting cholesterol levels?
  • Is there good research indicating that these adjustments results in improved health?
  • Is there good research, or any research, indicating the strong lethal nature of these medications, as alleged?
  • What organizations other than the US FDA have indicated support for these medications and their efficacy?
flag

2 Answers

1

"CSM advice (muscle effects)

The CSM has advised that rhabdomyolysis associated with lipid-regulating drugs such as the fibrates and statins appears to be rare (approx. 1 case in every 100 000 treatment years) but may be increased in those with renal impairment and possibly in those with hypothyroidism (see also notes above). Concomitant treatment with drugs that increase plasma-statin concentration increase the risk of muscle toxicity; concomitant treatment with a fibrate and a statin may also be associated with an increased risk of serious muscle toxicity."

This is taken from the British National Formulary - "the drug book" for UK doctors, dentists and pharmacists (as well as anyone else who has any involvement in prescribing or working with medical drugs). The CSM is the Committee on the Safety of Medicines.

In essence it means the likelihood of the serious adverse reaction, rhabdomyolysis, is very rare. 1 in 100,000 treatment years i.e. if 100,000 people took these drugs for 1 year, 1 person would have this reaction.

The meaning of the second statement is that if you also take drugs which interact to cause the level of statins in your blood (anti cholesterol drugs) to rise then the likelihood of muscle problems rises. Which is fairly obvious as it is analogous to taking a higher dose.

A fibrate is an alternative to a statin and is also a cholesterol lowering drug, sometimes used instead of a statin, sometimes used in addition to a statin. In this second type of use the taking of both fibrates and statins together is associated with increased risk of problems.

So in conclusion it seems that although statins and fibrates have small risks of serious problems they are prescribed to ward against the much higher risks, in those persons with high cholesterol, of heart disease and stroke. Anyone concerned about why they are taking statins or whether they are risky ought to discuss the matter with their GP.

link|flag
0

I know it's not answering the whole question but there's definitely evidence linking cholesterol medications (statins) with myalgias (muscle pains), myositis (muscle inflammation) and even rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown, life threatening). I've seen the first two in practice but not the third though I'm aware it's happened.

article on rhabdomyolysis rates with FDA data

link|flag
Stack Excahnge is not a forum or message board. Answers should be well research and sources cited where possible. If there is an explanation on another site please summerise it in your answer in addition to just providing links. Refer to the skepticexchange.org/faq – rjstelling Jul 10 at 19:23

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.