Ad hominem Logical Fallacy - Skeptic Exchange most recent 30 from http://www.skepticexchange.org2010-09-07T21:34:39Zhttp://www.skepticexchange.org/feeds/question/1http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://www.skepticexchange.org/questions/1/ad-hominem-logical-fallacyAd hominem Logical Fallacyrjstelling2009-10-15T12:01:09Z2010-01-26T14:03:41Z
<p>What is a Ad hominem Logical Fallacy? And what are the classic examples?</p>
http://www.skepticexchange.org/questions/1/ad-hominem-logical-fallacy/17#17Answer by citizenfaith for Ad hominem Logical Fallacycitizenfaith2009-10-15T16:21:16Z2009-10-15T16:21:16Z<p>Ad hominem (or 'to the man') is when in a debate, someone attacks their opponent rather than the arguments (s)he is putting forward.</p>
<p>Classic examples may be...</p>
<p>"You're wrong; you're a Socialist."</p>
<p>"I happen to know for a fact that you've had several extra-marital affairs. Why should we listen to anything you have to say on morality?"</p>
<p>"He used to work for Big pharma so everything he says is really just propoganda for the big corporations."</p>
http://www.skepticexchange.org/questions/1/ad-hominem-logical-fallacy/70#70Answer by johnfx for Ad hominem Logical Fallacyjohnfx2009-11-05T04:16:24Z2009-11-05T04:16:24Z<p>Here's an example: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Rush Limbaugh says that drug dealers
should get long prison sentences? He
was addicted to pain killers, what a
hypocrite. Nothing he says is
credible."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What makes it an ad hominem fallacy is that the rebuttal discredits the person making the claim, without addressing the facts of the actual claim itself. You can't really discredit a hypothesis simply by discrediting one person making that claim.</p>
http://www.skepticexchange.org/questions/1/ad-hominem-logical-fallacy/439#439Answer by Travelling Show and Tell Man for Ad hominem Logical FallacyTravelling Show and Tell Man2010-01-26T14:03:41Z2010-01-26T14:03:41Z<p>Without wishing to split hairs the above is not strictly true:</p>
<p>Another version of this fallacy is seen a lot in work or politics and is as follows:</p>
<p>Statement
<strong>"This project was a complete failure and achieved none of its objectives."</strong></p>
<p>Answer
<strong>"I worked really hard on this project."</strong></p>
<p>The answer does not attack the first person rather it promotes the respondant, however the effect is the same - the argument is not answered.</p>